Insights
Seminars & Events
News

Latest Insights

Case Law – Gunfleet Sands v HMRC New Ruling

A Court of Appeal hearing on the Gunfleet Sands v HMRC case has given rise to substantial additional tax reliefs on costs, previously interpreted as non qualifying for Capital Allowances by the First-Tier Tribunal.

20 Mar 2025

Written by: David Gibson

Case Law – Mersey Docks & Harbour Company v HMRC

HMRC continue to raise enquiries and to disallow items of plant that could be used for a claimant’s trade. This case relates to the quay wall at the Port of Liverpool

14 Jan 2025

Written by: Clive Curd

Case Law – Changi Airport Loses $273m Tax Break

Changi Airport Group (CAG) made Capital Allowances claims over three years totalling $272,575,162 on assets including the runways and taxiways but lost with the Court of Appeal determining that the assets were structures and not tools of trade.

20 Dec 2024

Written by: Tom Lo

Archive

 

Latest News

Case Law – Gunfleet Sands v HMRC New Ruling

20 Mar 2025

A Court of Appeal hearing on the Gunfleet Sands v HMRC case has given rise to substantial additional tax reliefs on costs, previously interpreted as non qualifying for Capital Allowances by the First-Tier Tribunal.

Case Law – Mersey Docks & Harbour Company v HMRC

14 Jan 2025

HMRC continue to raise enquiries and to disallow items of plant that could be used for a claimant’s trade. This case relates to the quay wall at the Port of Liverpool

Case Law – Changi Airport Loses $273m Tax Break

20 Dec 2024

Changi Airport Group (CAG) made Capital Allowances claims over three years totalling $272,575,162 on assets including the runways and taxiways but lost with the Court of Appeal determining that the assets were structures and not tools of trade.

Furnished Holiday Lets – HMRC Clarify Legislation

07 Nov 2024

The window to claim Capital Allowances tax relief on furnished holiday lettings (FHLs) is fast decreasing before repeal of the legislation in April 2025 and HMRC have now clarified the transitional rules about who can or can't claim.

New Case Law – Capital v Revenue

04 Oct 2024

A recent important Supreme Court decision in Centrica Overseas Holdings Limited v HMRC addresses the deductibility of expenses incurred by a company. The bar to deduct costs has been raised considerably

HMRC To Increase Scrutiny on Capital Allowances Claims

04 Oct 2024

Not only are Allowances more advantageous than ever before, but HMRC are strategically targeting tax leakage – including through Capital Allowances. Getting the correct advice is essential

100% Full Expensing – What is it and why it’s important

09 Sep 2024

Hailed as the “Greatest Tax Break in History” when it was introduced in 2021, the 130% Super Deduction aimed to take some of the sting away from the hike in Corporation Tax rate that was announced in the same speech. Its replacement, Full Expensing (FE), took over in April 2023 as a slightly less headline-grabby 100% First Year Allowance. But what is it?

Some Good News for Furnished Holiday Let Owners

05 Aug 2024

Positive transitional rules have now been published allowing Furnished Holiday Let owners the ability to use Capital Allowances beyond April 2025

Case Ruling – HMRC v Altrad Services Limited

10 Jul 2024

The decision by the Court of Appeal will have far reaching implications in that it clearly resets the boundaries of what is a capital allowances avoidance scheme designed to increase the quantum of capital allowances claimed

The Directors of Veritas Advisory were involved in the initial HMRC consultation into the interaction of Capital Allowances under the REIT legislation.  REITs operate under a shadow tax regime, which requires the mandatory claiming of all Capital Allowances.  Veritas Advisory in working with many of the REIT companies have an agreed approach that addresses one of the key compliance conditions facing a new REIT.

Converting to a REIT does not remove the tax reporting requirements even though there is no tax to pay at the vehicle holding level, to the extent it satisfies the required conditions, it does not pay any corporation tax on profits or capital gains tax on disposals.  Instead the tax is generally applied to the investor level providing they themselves do not have a tax exemption. But Capital Allowances must be claimed.

Capital Allowances are a form of tax relief which are available on certain types of property expenditure, whether this be on the acquisition of second hand assets by buying property or on the installation of new qualifying assets on developments, refurbishment or fitting out of property.

Whilst there is no tax advantage for a REIT to claim Capital Allowances, as there is for a direct investment in property, Capital Allowances do however provide an advantage by enabling more cash to be retained within the business for re-investment purposes.

Under the REIT legislation 90% of the profits must be distributed to shareholders, known as the property income dividend or PID. However, mandatory Capital Allowances are deducted from the profits that must be distributed, reducing the size of the PID to be issued. It could be argued therefore that Capital Allowances for a REIT, despite not offering a tax saving, remain extremely valuable as 90% of the value of the Capital Allowances can be retained within the business.

That said it is possible for a REIT to have both tax-exempt income and non-tax-exempt income, with the latter not complying to the REIT rules, for example, a new build development which is sold within 3 years of practical completion.  For the non-tax-exempt part of the business, the normal benefit of claiming Capital Allowances applies, reducing the tax liability on profits.

In order to satisfy the REIT condition of it being required to claim Capital Allowances, the onus is on the REIT to demonstrate that it has claimed where it had the entitlement to do so.  It is not acceptable to ignore or to apply blanket figures, as the REIT has to demonstrate that it has adhered to the same Capital Allowance rules as would a direct property investment.  There are two areas where this will need to be considered, on conversion and on all annual capex:

  • On Conversion

All properties which are to be brought under the tax-exempt business will need to demonstrate that Capital Allowances have been claimed to the extent they had entitlement to do so. This requires reviewing the entitlement position for Capital Allowances on each property, both at the time of its acquisitions and also on any subsequent expenditure.

  • On All Annual Capex

For each accounting period, the REIT must demonstrate that it has complied with claiming Capital Allowances where it had the entitlement to do so.  This applies to any points of expenditure, such as on new acquisitions, developments or even on lease incentives in the form of capital contributions

The question of how best to address this requirement has led Veritas Advisory to develop a REIT compliance service which it has adopted for a wide number of existing REIT companies.  In essence, it looks at putting in place procedures which will provide the necessary acknowledgement to HMRC that Capital Allowances have been fully considered by an independent Capital Allowances advisor across all its property expenditure.

Where a claim for Capital Allowances is identified, the value must be calculated in line with the Capital Allowances legislation.  Veritas Advisory will engage its team of consultants to prepare the resulting claim, which will be included within an annual REIT compliance Capital Allowances summary, providing the REIT with proof of compliance should it be called upon.

Given the relative benefit to the REIT in claiming Capital Allowances for the tax-exempt property income business, a claim is only progressed where a material benefit is established.  Through the use of our in-house cost bench-marking and sector knowledge of estimated claim values, the claim preparation process is streamlined to reduce the compliance cost to the REIT, but at the same time delivers full compliance.